Free first conversation
What you run, and what it has to survive.
A host has no general duty to monitor what customers store, and that is deliberate in European law rather than a loophole. What it does have is a duty to act once a proper notice arrives. Both halves matter, and most providers explain neither.
No general monitoring on one side, and prompt action on a proper notice on the other. Both get explained before you sign.
Hosting sites, applications and data, with the legal position explained.
See the programA mechanism anyone can use to report illegal content, acted on properly.
See the programA clear statement of reasons whenever anything is restricted or removed.
See the programAdvising on infrastructure, migrations and what should sit where.
See the programDo not monitor what customers store, act quickly once a precise notice creates actual knowledge, give a clear statement of reasons for any restriction, and never delete data before the retention period in the agreement has run.
What you run, and what it has to survive.
Backups, retention, availability, processor terms.
Expeditiously, and the reporter told.
What, why, and how to contest it.
Quoted per service in euro after a first conversation. Availability commitments are whatever the written agreement states.
Hosting for a site or a small application.
Hosting plus the support around it.
Said up front, because hosting runs on trust.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
WEB-STORM BV was created on 28 June 2022 and is registered with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises under number 0787.765.506, with its registered office at 11 Grensstraat in Aarschot, Flemish Brabant. The registered activities include computer consultancy, computing infrastructure, data processing and hosting.
Hosting sits under a legal arrangement that is worth explaining because it cuts both ways and almost no provider sets it out. On one side, there is no general obligation on a host to monitor the information it stores or to go hunting for unlawful material. That is deliberate in European law and it is the thing that keeps a provider out of a customer's files. On the other side, the exemption from liability only lasts while the host has no actual knowledge of something illegal. A notice that is sufficiently precise and properly substantiated creates that knowledge, and from that moment the host must act expeditiously. So there is a mechanism anyone can use to report content, notices are handled in a timely, diligent and non-arbitrary way, and the person who reported something is told what was decided. The duty owed back to customers is the mirror of it: where anything is removed, disabled, suspended or restricted, a clear and specific statement of reasons goes with it, saying what was restricted, on what ground, whether it followed a notice, and how to contest it. And data is not deleted before the retention stated in the agreement has run, because a customer should always have a real chance to get their own material back.
No, and there is no general obligation on a host to monitor the information it stores or to search actively for illegal activity. That is a deliberate feature of the European framework rather than a gap, and it is the reason your provider is not reading through your files. What changes the position is actual knowledge of something unlawful, which arrives through a notice rather than through routine inspection.
Precision. A notice must be sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated to be capable of creating actual knowledge, which in practice means identifying what the content is, where it is, and why it is said to be illegal. A vague assertion that something somewhere is objectionable is not a notice and we will say so rather than acting on it. Once a proper notice arrives, the obligation to act expeditiously begins.
It is assessed in a timely, diligent, non-arbitrary and objective way, and you are told. If anything of yours is restricted, you receive a clear and specific statement of reasons setting out what was restricted, the ground relied on, whether it followed a notice or our own check, and how to contest the decision. We will not cut something off and leave you to work out why from a monitoring alert.
Not without the agreement's notice period and retention period having run. Suspension for non-payment or breach follows what the written agreement says, and data is not deleted before the stated retention has expired, so you retain a realistic opportunity to retrieve it. Agreeing that in advance matters far more than it seems to on the day of signing.
Only to the extent a written service level agreement says so, and anything stated verbally about uptime is worth nothing at three in the morning. If availability matters to you, it belongs in the agreement with a number attached. The same goes for backups: do not assume one exists or that it covers what you think it covers unless the agreement says so, and ask when a restore was last actually tested.
No. We are not lawyers and we do not give legal advice, and whether a particular piece of content is lawful is a question for your own adviser. What we can tell you is how notices are handled here, what would happen if one arrived about your material, and what you would receive from us if we had to restrict anything. Those are the operational facts you can actually plan around.
A free first conversation, with no obligation.